Skip to content
  • Menu
  • Harm Reduction Decade

    Harm Reduction Decade

    Read our latest report calling for a Harm Reduction Decade, sign the Harm Reduction Decade Declaration, call for #10by20, and stand up for human rights of people who use drugs, their families and communities.

  • 10 by 20

    10 by 20 Campaign

    Everything you need to know about the 10 by 20 campaign

    10 by 20 Pie Chart

  • Global State of Harm Reduction

    Global State of Harm Reduction

    Our flagship publication is the biennial Global State of Harm Reduction report. First published in 2008, it involves a coordinated effort across practitioners, academics, advocates and activists to map global data and responses to HIV and hepatitis C epidemics related to unsafe injecting and non-injecting drug use. It is the only report to provide an independent analysis of the state of harm reduction in the world. The information collated within the report is stored and regularly updated on an interactive e-tool for researchers and advocates.

    The Global State of Harm Reduction report is supplemented by regular thematic reports and advisories on key issues and emerging challenges. Please search our Resource Library for more information or join our e-list for regular updates.

    Interactive e-tool

    Global State of Harm Reduction’ e-tool is an interactive resource containing up-to-date information on harm reduction policy and programming around the world. Users can select countries or regions and create tables for an at-a-glance guide to the current state of harm reduction worldwide.

  • News

    News and Announcements

    Read the latest announcements and updates from HRI.

  • About

    About HRI

    HRI is a leading non-governmental organisation working to reduce the negative health, social and human rights impacts of drug use and drug policy by promoting evidence-based public health policies and practices, and human rights based approaches to drugs. Read more about HRI’s history.

    Vision and Mission

    Our vision is a world in which individuals and communities benefit from drug laws, policies and practices that promote health, dignity and human rights.


    Meet our staff at HRI


    HRI is governed by a nine person Board of Directors, elected for three-year terms.

    What is harm reduction?

    Harm reduction refers to policies, programmes and practices that aim to reduce the harms associated with the use of psychoactive drugs in people unable or unwilling to stop. The defining features are the focus on the prevention of harm, rather than on the prevention of drug use itself, and the focus on people who continue to use drugs.

    Harm reduction definition and principles in 12 languages

    Contact Us

    Please feel free to contact us if you have any questions or queries about our website, our work, membership or the international harm reduction conference.


    HRI benefits from the generous support of the Open Society Foundations, the European Commission, the Elton John AIDS Foundation, the MAC AIDS Fund, UNAIDS, the World Health Organization, the UN Office on Drugs and Crime, the World Bank, The Robert Carr Networks Fund and the Swiss Government.

    Harm Reduction International Awards

    HRI presents a number of awards at outr international conference to acknowledge the contributions of outstanding groups or individuals in the field.

    Strategic Plan

    An international environment supportive of harm reduction scale up

  • Our Work

    Evidence for advocacy

    HRI produces groundbreaking research and policy analysis informing advocacy across our sector.

    Spending where it matters

    Funding for harm reduction services is dangerously short while billions are wasted on drug enforcement. HRI works to assess resourcing needs and advocates for a reinvestment in health.

    Human rights-based policy

    Human rights abuses and drug enforcement go hand in hand. HRI challenges laws, policies and practices that generate harm.

    The Death Penalty for Drug Offences

    HRI monitors the death penalty for drugs in law and practice worldwide, and also considers critical developments on the issue.

    Sector strengthening

    HRI builds advocacy coalitions and supports emerging harm reduction networks to strengthen the international harm reduction sector.

    International conference

    Harm reduction is a global movement. Our biennial gathering is the International Harm Reduction Conference, convened by HRI.

  • Resource Library

    Resource Library

    Use our extensive resource library to search for HRI, NGO and academic reports, articles and presentations, including materials from past international conferences.

    Harm Reduction Journal

    Harm Reduction Journal,, is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal whose focus is on the prevalent patterns of psychoactive drug use, the public policies meant to control them, and the search for effective methods of reducing the adverse medical, public health, and social consequences associated with both drugs and drug policies.

  • Support Us


    HRI relies on trusts, grants and donations to continue our work. To make a donation or pay membership fees, please use our secure payment page.

    Or why not fundraise for us with ‘Discover Adventure’?

    Contact Us

    Harm Reduction International
    Unit 2C09 Southbank Technopark
    90 London Road
    SE1 6LN  

    Tel: +44(0) 207 717 1592
    Fax: +44 (0) 207 922 8822
    Join us on facebook at: Harm Reduction International
    Or join us on Twitter at: HRInews


    Sign up to receive email updates, report launches, harm reduction advisories and information about the forthcoming international harm reduction conference

U.S. reinstates federal funding ban for needle and syringe exchange programmes

Date: 31 December 2011

  • Print
  • Bookmark and Share

On December 16, 2011, Congress restored the infamous ban on U.S. federal funding for needle and syringe exchange programmes. The decision comes just two years after the 21-year-old ban was repealed and signed into law by President Barack Obama in December 2009, thereby allowing states and local public health officials to utilise federal funds for sterile syringe access. The misguided move includes reinstatements of bans on both domestic and international use of US federal funds for needle and syringe exchange programmes as part of the 2012 omnibus spending bill.

In taking an action driven solely by ideology, the Republican-controlled U.S. House and the Democrat-controlled Senate ignore unanimous scientific evidence from eight federal reports showing that increasing access to sterile syringes for people who inject drugs saves lives without increasing drug use. Needle and syringe exchange programmes have been proven effective at preventing transmission of infectious diseases such as HIV and viral hepatitis, and have been shown to be cost-effective. [1] [2] Needle and syringe exchange programmes are endorsed as a core intervention as part of an evidence-based approach to HIV prevention, treatment and care for people who inject drugs by national and international agencies. These include the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), American Medical Association, National Academy of Sciences, American Public Health Association, as well as the European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA), World Health Organisation (WHO), United National Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) and the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS).

On World AIDS Day (1 December, 2011) President Obama delivered a bold speech, recommitting the United States to uphold U.S. funding for HIV/AIDS programmes at home and internationally during this time of economic crisis. A few weeks earlier, U.S. secretary of state Hilary Clinton promoted the prospect of an ‘AIDS-free generation’, urging renewed efforts and funds toward addressing the epidemic. Clinton urged people to grasp the “irreplaceable role the U.S. has played in the fight against HIV/AIDS”, emphasising that “the world […] will not defeat AIDS without us.”

It is difficult to understate the hypocrisy – and ominous nuance – of such statements in the face of the reinstatement of the federal funding ban. People who inject drugs make up twelve percent of all new HIV infections in the U.S., and account for 30% of HIV infections outside of sub-Saharan Africa. [3] In other parts of the world such as Eastern Europe, Central Asia and parts of South East Asia, injecting drug use is the major driver in up to 80 percent of new HIV infections. [4]

“Almost 30 years into the epidemic […] we deny people at extremely high risk of HIV the means to prevent infection,” writes Zoe Hudson, senior policy analyst with the Open Society Institute-Washington, D.C. “We could bring that number to zero -- and help people access treatment for addiction at the same time. But the Congress chooses not to."

Restoring the funding ban will result in significant human and fiscal costs as thousands of people both in America and abroad will contract HIV, hepatitis C and other infectious diseases. “Not only do opponents of needle-exchange programs misunderstand the data on their effectiveness, but they also fail to understand the invaluable message of empowerment and hope that such programs actually send," states Maia Szalavitz, a TIME health writer and former drug user.

In this precarious global economic context, the federal government’s policy change on needle and syringe exchange programmes will ensure that universal access to comprehensive HIV prevention, treatment, care and support services for people who inject drugs remains an unattainable goal. Earlier this year, The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria – the largest funder of harm reduction programming worldwide – cancelled its next funding round (Round 11) and significantly reduced the pool of eligible countries that will be able to apply for new funds in 2014, after donors failed to deliver US$2.2 billion in previously committed funding. Concerns around essential, evidence-based harm reduction programmes being scaled back or cut is growing.

At a time when global action and leadership in addressing HIV among people who inject drugs is needed most, U.S. policy-makers have chosen to regress to politics and ideology at the expense of scientific evidence, value for money and public health and safety.


[1] de Wit, A, & Bos, J. (2004). Cost-Effectiveness of Needle and Syringe Programmes: A Review of the Literature. In J. Jager, W. Limburg, M. Kretzschmar, M. Postma & L. Wiessing (Eds.), Hepatitis C and Injecting Drug Use: Impact, Costs and Policy Options (EMCDDA Monographs 7) (329-343). Lisbon: European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction.

[2] Jones, L, Pickering, L, Sumnall, H., McVeigh, J, & Bellis, MA. (2008). A Review of the Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Needle and Syringe Programmes for Injecting Drug Users. Final Full Report - Revised Oct 2008. Liverpool: Liverpool John Moores University.

[3] UNAIDS (2010) Global Report on the AIDS Epidemic. View report Geneva: The Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS.

[4] Mathers B et al (2008). The global epidemiology of injecting drug use and HIV among people who inject drugs: A systematic review. Lancet 372 (9651): 1733-1745.